Land
Sections 260-262. 439
I think sub-section 3 of Section 261 should be struck out and the rest of the Section and the following Section amended accordingly. The Remedy in the Case provided by Subsection 3 should be by Foreign Attachment. And it cannot be retained as it militates altogether with Section 260 which is taken from Section 38 of the Shanghai Rules.
Section 263.
This Provision calls for no remark.
Sections 264-266.
These Provisions as to Services of Process appear in Chapter I of my Abstract.
In subsection (1) of Section 265 the Term "Cause of Action" should be defined for the Reasons given above at the End of my note on Sections 186 - 201. (Foreign Attachment).
Section 267.
I recommend the Adoption of Sections 74-80 as...
Land
Sections 260-262.
439
I think sub-section 3 of Section 261 should
be stuck out and the rest of the Lection
and the following Section amended accordingly. The Remedy in the Case provided by Subsection 3 should be by Foreign Attachment. And it cannot be retained as it militates altogether with Lection yo which is taken from Section 38 of the Shanghai Rutes. -
Section 263.
This Provision calls for
no remark.
Sections 264-266.
These Provisions as to Services of Process
appear
in
Chapter I of my Abstract.
In subsection (1) of Section 265 the Term "Cause of Action" should be defined for the Reasons given above at the End of my note on Sections 186 - 201. (Foreign Attachment).
Section 267.
I recommend the Adoption of Lections 74-80 ave
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.